<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Project on National Security Reform (PNSR) Report &#8211; CIO Challenges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intelliwaresystems.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=72" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intelliwaresystems.com/blog/?p=72</link>
	<description>where strategy, process and technology converse</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:09:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dave fauth</title>
		<link>http://www.intelliwaresystems.com/blog/?p=72&#038;cpage=1#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>dave fauth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intelliwaresystems.com/blog/?p=72#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Daniel,
This is a multi-pronged problem of which technology can solve some of it. One problem is most people over classify information to begin with.  It is a lot easier to overclassify than to properly classify information.

Technology can solve part of the problem is the data is properly marked. At that point, data sharing becomes much easier.  However, many legacy systems aren&#039;t capable of supporting the markings.

Finally, there are multiple standards for marking.  Justice Department, DoD and the ODNI all have different standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel,<br />
This is a multi-pronged problem of which technology can solve some of it. One problem is most people over classify information to begin with.  It is a lot easier to overclassify than to properly classify information.</p>
<p>Technology can solve part of the problem is the data is properly marked. At that point, data sharing becomes much easier.  However, many legacy systems aren&#8217;t capable of supporting the markings.</p>
<p>Finally, there are multiple standards for marking.  Justice Department, DoD and the ODNI all have different standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://www.intelliwaresystems.com/blog/?p=72&#038;cpage=1#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intelliwaresystems.com/blog/?p=72#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been wondering if technology can address the problem of overclassificaiton. For example, I wonder how often a highly classified document contains identical content to a less classified one. I&#039;m sure it&#039;s rarely that black and white, but I wonder if a de-duping approach could at least reduce the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been wondering if technology can address the problem of overclassificaiton. For example, I wonder how often a highly classified document contains identical content to a less classified one. I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s rarely that black and white, but I wonder if a de-duping approach could at least reduce the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
